Cprice
USB C Fast Charger Block, 60W 5-Port USB C Wall Charging Blocks, Type C Charger Fast Charging Brick, 3USB C+2USB A PD&QC3.0 Multiport Charger Plug for iPhone 16/15/14/13 Pro Max, iPad, Galaxy-Black review image

USB C Fast Charger Block, 60W 5-Port USB C Wall Charging Blocks, Type C Charger Fast Charging Brick, 3USB C+2USB A PD&QC3.0 Multiport Charger Plug for iPhone 16/15/14/13 Pro Max, iPad, Galaxy-Black Review

Rating 3 sticker
3.0

Let's be real about what this charger is trying to do: solve the "one outlet, five devices" problem that plagues every desk, nightstand, and hotel room in existence. A 60W wall block with three USB-C ports and two USB-A ports, PD and QC3.0 on board, compatible with iPhones, iPads, Galaxy devices — on paper, it's the Swiss Army knife of charging bricks. Whether it delivers on that promise is a more complicated story.

The Case For It

Five ports is genuinely useful. If you're a household with a mix of older USB-A devices and newer USB-C gear — and that describes most families right now — having both standards in one block means fewer adapters cluttering your power strip. The 3+2 port split is a smart choice. USB-C is the future, but USB-A isn't dead yet.

The PD (Power Delivery) and QC3.0 support is the real selling point here. PD matters because iPhones from the 12 onwards and modern iPads benefit meaningfully from it. QC3.0 handles fast charging for compatible Android devices. In theory, you can fast-charge multiple devices simultaneously — which is exactly what a busy household or travel setup needs.

The 60W Reality Check

Here's what the listing won't spell out clearly: 60W total shared across five ports means the math gets ugly fast. Plug in five devices simultaneously and each port gets a fraction of that power budget. A MacBook Pro needs at least 67W just to charge at a reasonable rate under load — this block can't do that job alone. It's a phone-and-tablet charger, not a laptop charger, despite the USB-C branding suggesting otherwise.

Community discussions around budget multi-port chargers consistently raise the same concern: brand accountability and long-term safety. As one Reddit thread pointed out, for an expensive phone, skimping on the charger "doesn't make sense" — the recommendation being to stick with OEM or established brands like Anker or Belkin. This charger is from a less established name, which means the question of whether its safety certifications (over-voltage protection, short-circuit protection) are genuine or just claimed on a spec sheet is a real one worth asking.

Who This Is Actually For

This block makes most sense for:

  • Mixed-device households charging phones and tablets overnight — low-stakes, low-load usage where the shared wattage limitation doesn't matter
  • Travel setups where a single outlet needs to serve multiple people with different cable types
  • Desk clutter reduction — replacing two or three separate chargers with one block

It's less suited for anyone trying to fast-charge a laptop, or for someone with a flagship device they're protective of. The r/iphone community's broader discussion around charging also surfaced an interesting point worth keeping in mind: slow charging is actually gentler on battery health. If you're plugging in five devices overnight, the fact that each port delivers less wattage isn't necessarily a dealbreaker — it might even be preferable for longevity.

The Honest Drawbacks

Two things give pause. First, at 60W shared across five ports, simultaneous fast charging is more of a marketing promise than a practical reality. Second — and this matters more — the budget multi-port charger category has a real problem with unknown brands making safety claims that don't hold up. The r/iphone community's consensus is clear: for devices that cost $800–$1,200, the charger is not where you cut corners. If you're pairing this with a flagship iPhone 16 Pro Max or Galaxy S24 Ultra, consider whether the savings justify the uncertainty.

The UGREEN 65W 3-port block that circulates in deal communities (spotted at ~$19.75 on Amazon.ca) is a useful comparison point — it's from a brand with a stronger reputation, similar port count, and comparable wattage, and it's frequently recommended as a safer bet in the same price bracket.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can this charger fast-charge my iPhone 16 or Galaxy S24?

A: It supports PD and QC3.0, which are the protocols needed for fast charging on iPhones and most Android flagships. However, with 60W shared across five ports, full fast-charging speeds are most reliable when fewer ports are in use simultaneously.

Q: Can it charge a MacBook or laptop?

A: Not effectively under load. MacBooks typically require 67W or more just to maintain charge while in use. This block's 60W total output makes it unsuitable as a primary laptop charger, though it may trickle-charge a laptop when idle.

Q: Is it safe for expensive phones like iPhone 16 Pro Max?

A: The charger claims over-voltage and short-circuit protection, but community consensus among tech-savvy users is that for flagship devices, established brands like Anker or Belkin offer more verifiable safety credentials. It's a reasonable concern with lesser-known budget chargers.

Q: How does this compare to the UGREEN 65W charger?

A: The UGREEN 65W 3-port block is a frequently cited alternative at a similar price point, with a stronger brand reputation and PPS support. If you only need three ports, it's generally the more trusted recommendation in online communities.

Q: Does it come with cables?

A: Based on the product listing, no cables are included — just the charging block itself. You'll need your own USB-C and USB-A cables.

A 3-out-of-5. Functional for low-stakes multi-device overnight charging and genuinely convenient as a desk hub. But the shared wattage limitations and brand uncertainty keep it from being a confident recommendation for anyone charging premium devices or expecting true simultaneous fast charging. If the brand had stronger credentials, this would easily be a 4. As it stands, it's worth considering only if the price is right and your use case is modest.

— Tech Lead Editor 4, CPrice

Posted on May 25, 2026

0

Owner Experiences

Loading reviews...

Share Your Experience

0/5000